OCCAM'S FORENSIC JURY
Home Research
Equity Research · Single-Name Forensic Verdicts

The Research Stream

Single-name forensic verdicts on individual public companies. Four independent AI reasoning lenses. Weighted-mean merge. Dissent preserved on the public record.

How the Forensic Jury works

The OCCAM'S FORENSIC JURY™ is a multi-LLM forensic equity research methodology built by John Gillespie at InsightfulAgents.AI LLC. Each verdict runs through four independent AI reasoning lenses against the same source material (SEC filings, earnings transcripts, third-party financial data):

After all four return verdicts, a weighted-mean merge produces the final verdict. When lenses disagree by more than a defined threshold, the conflict is FLAGGED on the record and dissent is preserved verbatim. Read the full methodology page for the philosophical underpinnings and persona designations.

Published dossiers

Published May 23, 2026 · Sentinel refresh May 26, 2026 · The HOLD-with-Storyteller-SELL dossier · Companion video on @TheAIRazor

NVIDIA scored 100/100 on the Occam Score and a Rule of 40 of 113 — among the highest the methodology has ever evaluated at this scale. The methodology still returned HOLD. Our DCF says $104.15 against a market price of $213.20 (Sentinel refresh 2026-05-26); a third-party DCF says $250.61. The 58.4% deviation between two reasonable DCFs is the largest in recent run history. Three lenses said HOLD; the Storyteller dissented with SELL and flagged four absences in NVIDIA's disclosures.

Jury split: 3 HOLD (Auditor, Architect, Sentinel) 1 SELL (Storyteller) → Final HOLD @ MEDIUM

Read the full NVDA dossier →

Published May 19, 2026 · The preserved-dissent dossier · Companion video on @TheAIRazor · Companion article on LinkedIn

Our DCF said STRONG BUY (+54%). Wall Street's DCF said SELL (-18%). Buffett-Lynch said HEALTHY Stalwart. Peers said DEEP_DISCOUNT. Three of four independent inputs agreed bullish. The 4-LLM Jury refused to synthesize and FLAGGED the disagreement instead. The dossier preserves all four lens narratives verbatim.

Jury split: 2 BUY (Auditor, Sentinel) 1 HOLD (Architect) 1 FLAGGED (Storyteller) → Final FLAGGED @ HIGH

Read the full QCOM dossier →

Published May 14, 2026 · Companion video forthcoming

Three of our four AI lenses said HOLD on OBDC. Then OBDC cut the dividend 16% on May 7, 2026. The same 0.82x NII coverage gap that drove the cut is what the methodology read as the primary risk vector. One lens pulled stale data and produced a now-falsified BUY — both reads stay on the record per the dissent-preservation discipline.

Jury split: 3 HOLD (Auditor, Architect, Storyteller) 1 BUY (Sentinel, stale-data) → Final HOLD @ MEDIUM

Read the full OBDC dossier →

Published May 14, 2026 · Companion video forthcoming

Excellent business. Problem price. All four lenses converge on overvaluation — DCF $123.33 against market $301.64, a 59% premium. The Architect lens returned FLAGGED on the structural tension between an Occam Score of 95 (HEALTHY classification) and a DCF that says STRONG SELL. The FLAGGED-override triggers the final hero verdict.

Jury split: 1 SELL (Auditor) 1 FLAGGED (Architect) 1 SELL (Storyteller) 1 STRONG SELL (Sentinel) → Final FLAGGED @ HIGH

Read the full MDB dossier →

Published May 11, 2026 · Updated May 12, 2026 · Companion video on @TheAIRazor

ELITE quality at a SELL price. DCF $515.19 against market price near $602. Occam Score 100 / Rule of 40 score 79.8. Two lenses called the price overstretched. One pushed back on the cross-references. One disagreed entirely on conviction. The dissent is preserved on the public record.

Jury split: 1 BUY (Auditor) 2 SELL (Architect, Storyteller) 1 HOLD (Sentinel) → Final HOLD @ MEDIUM

Read the full META dossier →

Published May 3, 2026 · Updated May 11, 2026 · Companion video on @TheAIRazor

Wall Street rated Alphabet 88% BUY at $402. The Forensic Jury reached SELL at $160 intrinsic value — a −51.5% margin of safety driven by the $91B annual CapEx hole and 60.8% terminal-value share of enterprise value. Three lenses converged. One pushed back on the post-Q1 analyst repricing.

Jury split: 3 SELL (Auditor, Architect, Storyteller) 1 HOLD (Sentinel) → Final SELL @ MEDIUM

Read the full GOOGL dossier →

Other streams

§ 4. Disclosure and disclaimer

The research stream is published as educational and methodological commentary. Dossiers are not personalized investment advice and do not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. The author and InsightfulAgents.AI LLC are not registered investment advisers, broker-dealers, or financial planners under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 or any state-level analogue, and nothing in this stream should be construed as creating a fiduciary relationship.

The author may or may not hold positions in any security or entity discussed; positions can change without notice. All claims are sourced to SEC filings, earnings transcripts, or named third-party data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

For a full disclosure framework, see /disclosures/ or /legal.html.